The ongoing debate surrounding self-driving cars mostly focuses on whether or not these cars are actually involved in motor vehicle accidents at a lower rate than that of regular cars. If self-driving cars provide no additional safety, then it is unlikely that people will be willing to pay more to drive one. What’s more, there is some indication that the technology might actually lead to accidents in some cases, accidents that might have been prevented had a person been driving the car manually. In such a situation, it would be wise to contact an expert car accident attorney at 617-787-3700.
In a recent study, which catalogued all accidents involving self-driving cars between 2014 and 2018 in California, it was revealed that the vast majority of these car accidents were the fault of humans, as opposed to the technology of the self-driving cars. In all but one of the 38 auto accidents that occurred when a self-driving car was moving, the fault was entirely with the person operating the vehicle. Similarly, in all 24 of the car accidents that occurred while a self-driving car was parked, the fault was with the person operating the vehicle.
Many people remain skeptical that handing over control of operating a motor vehicle to the vehicle will actually improve safety on the roads. This sentiment is one of the biggest obstacles to self-driving cars hitting the roads in large numbers. Although this study is limited in scope, it is at least an indication that humans remain the greatest threat to road safety.
If you or a loved one has been injured as the result of a car accident, you may be entitled to significant monetary relief. Act now and contact an expert car accident attorney here at the Law Offices of Gilbert R. Hoy, Jr. and Affiliates to discuss your potential claim. Call our Massachusetts injury attorney specialists today at 617-787-3700 or email us at email@example.com for your free and private consultation. Your needs are our top priority!
State and local governments have a responsibility for the safety of their citizens. Sometimes, efforts by these governments will be uniform across the nation, as there are a number of ubiquitous dangers facing everyone in the country. Car accidents, for example, are a problem everywhere, and states implement speeding guidelines and post warnings to try and stifle the dangers posed by motor vehicles. Some dangers, however, are unique to particular states, and their local governments must implement unique strategies to deal with these problems.
For example, trees falling onto motorists in California, in the Tahoe Basin in particular, has posed an enormous safety hazard and results in deaths every year. Earlier this year, during heavy winter snowstorm weather on Highway 89, a tree fell into the roadway and killed a Tahoe City woman as she drove in her car in Squaw Valley. Other mountain highways near the lake have also experienced tragic crashes caused by falling limbs and trees. California is responding by implementing initiatives to reduce this risk, and highway 89 will be where crews begin their work. A $115 million California safety campaign has made it possible for crews to have already cut down more than 100,00 dead trees all over the state on state property next to highways.
The next step is for public safety workers to approach people who own houses next to the highway in order to get permission to cut down trees that pose a particular risk. It is illegal for the state to cut down any such trees without permission, and the trees must meet a variety of specifications in order to be eligible.
If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto accident, you may be entitled to significant monetary relief. Act now and contact an expert auto accident attorney here at the Law Offices of Gilbert R. Hoy, Jr. and Affiliates to discuss your potential claim. Call our Boston injury attorney specialists today at 617-787-3700 or email us at firstname.lastname@example.org for your free and private consultation. Your needs are our top priority!
If someone is ever unfortunate enough to be in a serious car accident, the first point of concern is whether any party involved in the accident has sustained serious injuries. Car accidents are commonplace, and they result in severe injuries every day. Beyond that, the next inquiry is on the economic side of things: what insurance will cover, how much repairs will cost, and to what extent one party may be economically liable to another. In such a situation, it would be wise to contact an expert car accident attorney at 617-787-3700.
When a car accident does occur, we at least expect one or both of the parties involved to be responsible for the economic consequences of the collision, regardless of who might have been driving. Fundamental notions of fairness and accountability reinforce the notion that only those directly responsible for something like a car crash should have to share in its burden.
This notion of fairness is exactly why Delaware County, Pennsylvania residents are up in arms after learning that a Pennsylvania state representative has crashed her car three times in the past three years, and each time the repairs and insurance bills have been footed by the state taxpayers. Representative Margo Davidson has allegedly racked up $30,000 in insurance and repairs for car accidents over the past three years, leading many to wonder what kind of system would allow such a use of taxpayer money. The most recent incident came when Rep. Davidson rear-ended another car, only for the officer on site to discover she was driving with a suspended license.